X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,SARE_MSGID_LONG45,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4BBA2AE2.2090000@gmail.com> References: <4BB9E481 DOT 8090706 AT gmail DOT com> <4BB9FCEF DOT 7090404 AT gmail DOT com> <4BBA032F DOT 9050006 AT gmail DOT com> <4BBA0A82 DOT 3040007 AT gmail DOT com> <4BBA2AE2 DOT 2090000 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 21:39:55 +0300 Received: by 10.91.185.3 with SMTP id m3mr1510666agp.79.1270492796049; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: cygintl-8.dll was not found From: wefwef wefwef To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >>>>> =A0You also proposed adding a feature it already has, a column tellin= g you >>>>> whether a package is already installed or not. =A0This tells me that = you are not >>>>> calmly and dispassionately observing what is in front of your eyes. >>>> It doesn't have a column dedicated for this purpose, that column is >>>> used also to instruct the installer what to do. >>> =A0You are looking at the wrong column. >>> >>> =A0Look at the column immediately to its left. >>> >>> =A0The one labelled "Current". >>> >>> =A0The one that shows you the currently-installed version of the packag= e, or >>> nothing if it is not currently installed. >>> >>> =A0Perhaps you could get that two-year old you mentioned earlier to poi= nt it >>> out to you. >> Thanks, but it seems I already have. > > =A0Haha, very funny, but that doesn't make you any less wrong. =A0You wer= e unable > to see something that was right in front of your face. =A0Given that, it's > perfectly reasonable for me not to just take your other claims at face va= lue > but need some kind of verification, like steps by which to reproduce any > supposed bug. You also can't see obvious flaws that are right in front of your face, even after they have been pointed out to you several times. > >>>> If that's the case, then why does it offer to save packages without >>>> installing - it obviously was intended as a way of downloading and >>>> installing later. >>> =A0Yes, exactly. =A0It is a way of downloading, for later installation,= the exact >>> same set of packages it would download and install at the same time if = you ran >>> it in install-from-internet mode. >>> >>> =A0Not some arbitrary different set of packages. =A0You made that bit u= p. >>> >>>> The fact is that the obvious way it should work, >>> =A0You're just elevating your own mistaken assumptions to the status of >>> "obvious" truths. =A0You need to get over yourself. >> Wow, you just can't help throwing insults around - well done, you're >> great at that at least. > > =A0I thought after your vitriolic post about "so obvious a two-year old c= ould > see it" that you were happy with this style of communication. =A0Regardle= ss, > claiming that your mistaken assumption is "obvious" and everyone else in = the > world is wrong for not seeing things your way is pretty much the definiti= on of > needing to get over yourself. There's plenty of other people saying that the cygwin installer is junk - it's just that if you ignore everyone, you will come to the conclusion that it is perfect as you obviously have. > > =A0I note that in this entire post you haven't addressed one issue of > substance. =A0All the points that I made are unrebutted, and still releva= nt, > regardless of how you feel about the tone in which I delivered them. > >>> =A0Still no log files, I see. =A0It's almost as if you didn't want to d= emonstrate >>> that there is a bug or have it fixed. =A0I promise you, if you've found= a bug, I >>> will indeed write the code necessary to fix it, but you have to be able= to >>> show it to me. >> >> Dave, thanks, but cygwin obviously doesn't want my input, and I =A0don't >> want your help. > > =A0Went back and looked at the log files and realised that you did choose= the > wrong directory on the local package dir screen after all, did you? =A0Now > you're manufacturing an argument so that you can throw a dramatic strop a= nd > storm out without having to admit that you made a mistake? No I haven't made any mistakes, I've stated what is wrong with the cygwin installer - it has a bad user interface with obvious design flaws, and it doesn't produce consistent results. I also found out that cygwin don't care about quality, and to expect poor standards - as you've made it perfectly clear. > > =A0Well, never mind. =A0You've got the working minimal cygwin installatio= n you > wanted now, and you know how to do it again, and setup.exe works perfectly > well to do what you want, so it is indeed true that you don't need my hel= p. Setup.exe doesn't work perfectly at all. I have zero confidence that it will produce the same results next time I run it. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple