X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:36:41 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: tty initialization failure under cygwin 1.7.2? Message-ID: <20100402113641.GA9776@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <443209 DOT 59478 DOT qm AT web55105 DOT mail DOT re4 DOT yahoo DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <443209.59478.qm@web55105.mail.re4.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Apr 1 14:31, Eric Berge wrote: > > > I recently updated to 1.7.2 from 1.7.1 with the March 15 development > patch and noticed I was getting some process failures. In particular > I was running the Coverity static analysis tool, and was getting an > error about not being able to "initialize fd 0 for /dev/tty0". > > This problem does not appear to occur with remote desktop, just with > ssh. > > I've been searching around for a simpler version of the problem > and this is what I found: > > The test scenario is to do the following: > > 1. ssh into an cygwin sshd server with an explicit password > 2. Run "cmd" > 3. From "cmd" run "ls" > > I unfortunately no longer have the 1.7.1 + Mar15 patch running but > with cygwin 1.5 and running "ls" lists the entries of the directory > as expected. However, running on 1.7.2 has the following output: > > C:\cygwin\home\eberge>ls > ls > 12 [main] ls 3984 C:\cygwin\bin\ls.exe: *** fatal error - couldn't initialize fd 0 for /dev/tty0 > > C:\cygwin\home\eberge> > > I hope this is reflective of the problem I had with Coverity. It is > the same error message at least. Is this indicative of an underlying > problem in 1.7.2 or is this related to any sort of reconfiguration I > need to do on my box after updating to 1.7.2? I'm wondering if that's a side effect with some other software. I can not reproduce your problem. I tried your test scenario and it works for me. I don't get any weird error from ls. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple