X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew DeFaria Subject: Re: chmod fails for MS-DOS style path in cygwin 1.7.2-2 Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:03:34 -0700 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <659733 DOT 98534 DOT qm AT web94508 DOT mail DOT in2 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20100401142149 DOT GA30847 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <20100401142149.GA30847@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-Stationery: 0.5.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 04/01/2010 07:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:09:29PM +0530, prakash babu wrote: >> I am using cygwin 1.7.2-2 and chmod fails for MS-DOS style path with >> the following error message. >> >> eg: chmod 755 C:\\FileName >> >> cygwin warning: MS-DOS style path detected: C:\FileName >> Preferred POSIX equivalent is: /cygdrive/c/FileName >> CYGWIN environment variable option "nodosfilewarning" turns off this >> warning. >> Consult the user's guide for more details about POSIX paths: >> http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#using-pathnames >> >> This used to work in cygwin 1.5 . >> >> Is there any workaround available for this currently ? >> >> Is this a bug in 1.7 which will be fixed in the upcoming versions ? > > How could a specific error message, which tells you how to turn it > off, be construed as a bug? Maybe a bug as in "this bothers me". Sorta like the feeling I get when I hear, IMHO, the stupid message "It is not necessary to dial a 1 when calling this number". My thoughts tend to run "If you know the problem - and have the solution - why the #$&* are you telling me?!?". To me a better wording of that message would be "Did you know you do not need to dial a 1 when calling this number", but that does leave a question of "well exactly which (US) numbers do I need the 1 for and which don't I? How do I tell?" I understand this is a warning message and I can easily turn it off, etc. I'm just saying... -- Andrew DeFaria Advice - Do not use a hatchet to remove a fly from your forehead. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple