X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:43:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: scp no longer reports incremental progress Message-ID: <20100401144305.GA31187@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <806a89db1003291509t34fb9e26y84a9c8a212f64a6d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4BB125E5 DOT 2020203 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20100329221438 DOT GA8111 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100331181715 DOT GB20959 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:00:42PM +0300, Matthias Andree wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote on 2010-03-31: > >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:14:39PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:12:53PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >>>> On 3/29/2010 6:09 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: >>>>> I am running the latest Cygwin (1.7.2) and ssh. >>>>> >>>>> I notice that scp (from local to remote host) no longer shows an >>>>> incremental progress bar. It just reports 100% completion >>>>> immediately, then I have to wait until the copy is actually done. >>>> >>>>> Sink: C0644 11015296 dx4wawd.zip >>>>> dx4wawd.zip >>>>> 100% 11MB 10.5MB/s 00:00 >>>> >>>> Hmm...same behavior here. Didn't we see this behavior before, about a >>>> year ago? I think what fixed it back then was some cgf magic in the >>>> socket fhandler innards. >>>> >>>> Uh-oh. One of the changes between 1.7.1 and 1.7.2 was more socket work. >>> >>> Actually, I think it was pipe related. >> >> And, it was. I removed what I thought was an stupid function. As it >> turns out the function was needed but it just wasn't working quite >> right. >> >> Today's snapshot, uploaded a few minutes ago, should fix the problem. > >Euh, 20100331 seems to introduce regressions for me compared to 20100328. >scp now seems broken for me, > >$ scp -vvvvv somefile user AT example DOT org:/tmp/ >Executing: program /usr/bin/ssh host example.org, user user, command scp >-v -t -- /tmp/ > >and often just hangs there, while PuTTY's pscp and interactive ssh to the >same host + login works just fine, and also if I'm using the 20100328 >snapshot. > >With gdb attached, it succeeds once in a while. How big is "somefile" and where is "example.org"? Is it a local machine? In another country/state/continent? What kind of system is it? cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple