X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:11:31 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: how was debate on _GNU_SOURCE resolved? can't find pthread_getattr_np Message-ID: <20100328051131.GA17018@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20100327162944 DOT GA13314 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20100327183447 DOT GB13314 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 03:50:00PM -0400, mike marchywka wrote: >On 3/27/10, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Function declarations which don't exist in any header file cannot show >>up when you set a flag. > >They exist in SOME header as they came up on google- I didn't know what >may be available elsewhere, the fact it isn't on my system doesn't mean >it doesn't exist. The functions are not implemented in Cygwin. The reason why is either because no one has gotten around to it or no one is interested. And, no, it is not likely that people are lining up to implement them now either. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple