X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-id: <4BABE8D8.4090602@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:51:04 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320  Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: File permissions on samba network share
References: <loom DOT 20100325T074932-533 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>  <20100325085246 DOT GE7718 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <20100325090748 DOT GG7718 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <loom DOT 20100325T231927-996 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-reply-to: <loom.20100325T231927-996@post.gmane.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 3/25/2010 6:38 PM, Chris wrote:

<snippage>

> Sorry I forgot to mention that the permissions on the Linux machine
> running the Samba server are more similar to the ones when I mount the
> network drive without the "noacl" option in Cygwin.
>
> This is the ls line from the Linux machine:
> -rwxrw----  1 chris tech 1014 Dec 15 14:16 amssetup
>
> On Cygwin without "noacl":
> -rwxrw---- 1 ???????? ???????? 1014 2009-12-15 14:16 amssetup
>
> On Cygwin with "noacl"
> -rw-r--r-- 1 chris None 1014 2009-12-15 14:16 amssetup
>
> So apart from the ???????? entries, I think going without the "noacl"
> option would be the way to go. But I will give it a try with "noacl" and
> see if it has any undesired side-effects.

For the curious - <http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-ids>

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple