X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4BA90A7A.4090908@etr-usa.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:37:46 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: recvfrom + MSG_PEEK = broken? References: <4BA7085D DOT 3050307 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20100322110352 DOT GA32321 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4BA7D40E DOT 5010504 AT etr-usa DOT com> <4BA85E92 DOT 5080700 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: <4BA85E92.5080700@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/23/2010 12:24 AM, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Peeking is evil: >> > That's all well and good, but I'm not writing new code; I also see no > need to rewrite xinetd from the ground up, I was just trying to explain Corinna's observation that peeking is rare. There are good reasons to avoid it even aside from MS's bugs. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple