X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4BA54492.8050903@slittle.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:56:34 +1100 From: scott User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin vs Via C3: nothing happens, no output References: <4BA452E4 DOT 7050600 AT slittle DOT com> <4BA4E1B2 DOT 3020507 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4BA4E1B2.3020507@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >> I'm attempting to install on a Via EPIA-5000 (533Mhz C3/Samuel 2) >> without success... is this platform not supported? > Hmmm, quite likely not. Everything in the Cygwin distro is compiled for > i686 or above CPUs. C3 is crippled, isn't it? No SSE/MMX, all that stuff? According to the internets... the C3 purports to be a i686-class processor, and has MMX/3DNow, but does not have the supposedly optional CMOV instruction that other processors of its class have. Some people managed to get i686 kernels to run, some didn't, depending on the distro. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple