X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4BA29850.6090904@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:17:04 -0600 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Updated [experimental]: coreutils-8.4-1 References: <1268946991 DOT 24982 DOT 1365562705 AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com> In-Reply-To: <1268946991.24982.1365562705@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD7348D72931940A5F5079D34" X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --------------enigD7348D72931940A5F5079D34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/18/2010 03:16 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > Eric Blake wrote: >> On 03/11/2010 10:18 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> For those people testing cygwin snapshots, a new release of coreutils, >>> 8.4-1, has been uploaded. 7.0-2 remains current, because the 8.4-1 >>> release depends on features available only in recent snapshots (that is, >>> don't upgraded if you are still using the current cygwin 1.7.1). >> >> Is no one else testing this? I'm thinking I introduced a bug, because >> 'mv a b' creates 'b.exe', even if 'a' did not have an implicit .exe, and >> am looking into building 8.4-2 to fix it. >=20 > Sorry -- I had run into this problem, but didn't report it. I was > running some-random-self-built-snapshot of cygwin1.dll, so I wasn't sure > if the problem was that my cygwin1.dll didn't have the correct changes, > or if there was actually a problem in coreutils. I meant to track it > down and report it if the prob was in coreutils, but I forgot; sorry > about that. No problem. Serves me right for not checking sooner; I was traveling earlier this week, so today was the first time I really got to test my own snapshot. I think I found the bug, though, so expect coreutils-8.4-2 later today. --=20 Eric Blake eblake AT redhat DOT com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --------------enigD7348D72931940A5F5079D34 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuimFAACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBPowCfWaf10L4fLsPciRzjXHYWmIFH xWUAnivUQP8sJHuCwiT/hgrFrAZ7lZvO =LUSf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD7348D72931940A5F5079D34--