X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=1 a=aCRlMrwmDrwA:10 a=VphdPIyG4kEA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=zk19hA/YTAL+guUbg/dVXQ==:17 a=1IVkO5ELDJ8EJz_Y9fkA:9 a=fh-ectH-XpQPDqxtv8Wh5cQy0TQA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Message-ID: <4BA19876.1080207@monai.ca> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:05:26 -0700 From: Steven Monai User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: incomplete/corrupted setup.exe References: <1268766945 DOT 5263 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <20100317150649 DOT GA29284 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4BA17A9F DOT 2000808 AT monai DOT ca> <20100318015424 DOT GA4949 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20100318015424.GA4949@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2010/03/17 6:54 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > Oh. Are we still talking about this? I drifted off. > > Somebody please wake me when all of this tempest in a bikeshed is over. I don't understand the reason for the dismissive attitude. Pretty much every other distro posts cryptographic hashes and/or signatures with their binary downloads, so users can verify the correctness and authenticity of downloaded files. Why doesn't Cygwin do this? -SM -- -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple