X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received-SPF: pass (mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk: domain of ged AT jubileegroup DOT co DOT uk designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk; client-ip=127.0.0.1; helo=mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk; envelope-from=ged AT jubileegroup DOT co DOT uk; x-software=spfmilter 0.98-gwh with libspf2-1.2.9; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:15:23 +0000 (GMT) From: "G.W. Haywood" To: "Cygwin mailing list." Subject: Re: incomplete/corrupted setup.exe In-Reply-To: <1268850529.17026.ezmlm@cygwin.com> Message-ID: References: <1268850529 DOT 17026 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-Country: localhost Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi there, On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 cgf wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:45:47AM +0000, G.W. Haywood wrote: > >On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 Csaba Raduly wrote: > >>>Perhaps the MD5 and/or SHA1 checksums for the current setup.exe should > >>>be published (and updated every time there's a new release) next to the > >>>download link (like Apache does, for example) > > > >That would be a very acceptable alternative to my original suggestion > >of renaming setup.exe each time it's (re)released, even if it's a bit > >more work for you. :( Thanks. > > To be clear ... until the mailing list is flooded with people who > can't download setup.exe because we don't have https access, I am > satisfied with not doing anything. In the interests of further clarity, all I've really been asking for is a way for people to know exactly what they're downloading when they click the download link. The fact that some caching proxies might be fooled into doing something less unhelpful than normal would just be an incidental bonus. I agree that the idea of using https would seem to be overkill, and in any case it doesn't address other issues which are covered if you publish the md5sums of each release. When there's a way to verify the file contents, files can if necessary be sent by email to people who have trouble downloading. -- 73, Ged. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple