X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:11:15 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: EXEEXT Message-ID: <20100317181115.GT6505@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F2C1E9BE AT A1DAL1SWPES19MB DOT ams DOT acs-inc DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2BF01EB27B56CC478AD6E5A0A28931F2C1E9BE@A1DAL1SWPES19MB.ams.acs-inc.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mar 17 13:02, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: > For Cygwin, I've been defining: > > EXEEXT := .exe > > Then, to keep my Makefiles portable: > > clean : > $(RM) $(MAIN)$(EXEEXT) > > It appears that we don't have do this EXEEXT dance > anymore, however I've not seen any official word on > this. Is there official word? Not without asking a lawyer first. Inofficially I'd say you can try. You don't need it for building or removing or stuff like that. coreutils still has a few minor problems which should be mostly fixed with the not-yet-release-but-soon-to-be Cygwin 1.7.2 and the experimental coreutils 8.4-1 which requires Cygwin 1.7.2. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple