X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4BA03C96.2090605@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:21:10 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: IPv6 help (Re: inetutils, r* commands) References: <4B9EEF35 DOT 9000701 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/16/2010 8:41 AM, Antonio Querubin wrote: > You might find it simpler to just make all sockets/sockaddrs AF_INET6. > The only time you might worry about the actual AF would be on display > output. Ie. display IPv4-mapped addresses as IPv4. That's not really an option. I'm the inetutils (e.g. r* clients and daemons, telnet client and daemon, etc) maintainer for cygwin -- I'm trying to create the next official cygwin release of those tools. I don't think people would be very happy if they only supported IPv6. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple