X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B9EEC2D.9020602@monai.ca> References: <1268526388 DOT 20918 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <20100314163002 DOT GA12172 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <03988E63C1BD48809EA3A27E4D6A3661 AT phoenix> <4B9D1B9C DOT 6000302 AT monai DOT ca> <20100314190223 DOT GD13515 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4B9EEC2D DOT 9020602 AT monai DOT ca> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:53:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1ef5a52f1003160253g55aa7bf7l79bda3768f50c969@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: incomplete/corrupted setup.exe From: Csaba Raduly To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Steven Monai wrote: [snip] > IT departments are becoming increasingly security conscious. That's > probably why the OP had trouble downloading setup.exe. It wasn't because > his IT was "brain-dead", but because there are legitimate security > concerns about downloading an unsigned exe over a non-SSL-authenticated > channel. Unfortunately, many IT departments follow the "We must do something. This is something. Therefore we must do this." action plan :/ Installing a webfilter falls into this category, IMO. > I suggest people inform themselves about the current state of art in > "man-in-the-middle" hijacking attacks, because the means by which > cygwin.com currently distributes setup.exe is vulnerable to a MITM > surreptitiously delivering a trojan setup.exe in place of the actual. > For this reason, I caution Cygwin users against downloading setup.exe > over unsafe networks (e.g. public wireless hotspots, hotel networks, etc.). Or the Internet, in general :) Perhaps the MD5 and/or SHA1 checksums for the current setup.exe should be published (and updated every time there's a new release) next to the download link (like Apache does, for example) -- Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple