X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4B9A3F85.4050506@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:20:05 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: fork problems on x64 References: <4B99D2E9 DOT 60108 AT rosshemail DOT com> In-reply-to: <4B99D2E9.60108@rosshemail.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 3/12/2010 12:36 AM, Ross Hemingway wrote: > I have the same problems with multiple apps - Exim and UW-ipop. They > both fail with the same faults: > fork: Resource temporarily unavailable > > The Exim will send a few mails, but will fail after a few minutes use. > UW-ipop fails the first time its called into use. Both are loaded as > services into an x64 2008 R2 server. > > I notice the mail list has other "x64 fork" problem reports. My > suspicion is the fault is in the core cygwin dll. Any thoughts please? Did you try rebaseall? -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple