X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Francis Litterio <flitterio AT gmail DOT com>
Subject: Re: setfacl fails to replace ACLs when given a pathname starting  with   a drive letter
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:50:58 +0000 (UTC)
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <loom.20100310T234947-513@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom DOT 20100310T223730-987 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <31b7d2791003101403t5ac23548m27dbc1e591ef1417 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>  	<loom DOT 20100310T231120-570 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <31b7d2791003101430x182fa852w2e7737b1a3617f81 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <loom DOT 20100310T233552-556 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <4B982163 DOT 8030906 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Eric Blake <eblake <at> redhat.com> writes:

> Yes, this is on purpose.  Use of a drive letter says that you DON'T want
> POSIX path processing, therefore, you are also giving up ACL processing.
> Moral of the story - don't expect drive letters to do what you want.
> Use POSIX paths.

Thanks, Eric.  I just wanted to be sure this wasn't a bug.
--
Fran



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple