X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4B929995 DOT 2050409 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:54:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Redaction request From: Robert Pendell To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:14 PM, mike marchywka wrote: > What?You guys did an edit? I think I can speak as > the leader for "people who post stupid things" and > normally you just look back and cringe or laugh. > That is what learning is all about. > IF you posted deep questions, people would charge to provide > answers. Simple questions often help others with similar > misunderstandings. Revisionism just for the heck > of it seems to create all kinds of problems. > > The policy affects the contents of the archive mostly. It basically says that anything in the archive stays there and can't be edited or removed once it gets there. In other words there are no redactions made after the post is committed. Generally speaking though wanting to or actually removing/modifying statements already made public draws extra attention and tends to cause the opposite of what is intended. Robert Pendell shinji AT elite-systems DOT org CAcert Assurer "A perfect world is one of chaos." -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple