X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B8DD7DF.6090006@redhat.com> References: <4B8DCB6C DOT 3010207 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <2bf229d31003021901g4c7f3b8fu340c1be2886d5f3 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4B8DD7DF DOT 6090006 AT redhat DOT com> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 06:27:41 -0500 Message-ID: <2bf229d31003030327v7d350815qcecde7c0557f8cfa@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: "tail" command does not work as advertised From: Chris Sutcliffe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >> Note that the +N notation is specific to --lines=, not the '-n' >> shorthand. > > Wrong - the +N notation also works with -n: > > ps -a | tail -n +5 Ah, I was confused since 'tail -5' still works, but: > This is a side affect of the change to the newer POSIX standard. > http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#Old-tail-plus-N-syntax-now-fails This explains it. Cheers! Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple