X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <21202.67532.qm@web19007.mail.hk2.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:14:58 +0800 (HKT) From: Dave Lee Subject: Re: Problem in calling _stat() on Cygwin 1.7 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Note-from-DJ: This may be spam > If it (meddling with internal affairs, such as using _stat) > hurts too much, then don't do it (use stat instead, it's > standardized). An off-topic question: on system where both XXX() and _XXX() are available (where XXX = open, read, write, access, chmod, ... etc), can one assume what _XXX() does, and that _XXX() behaves the same as XXX()? Thanks for help. Dave Lee -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple