X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B85E902.7040209@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:05:38 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: terminfo [Re: console enhancements: mouse events etc] References: <4B266F9B DOT 6070204 AT towo DOT net> <20091214171323 DOT GS8059 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20091215130036 DOT GA19394 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B28ACE8 DOT 1050305 AT towo DOT net> <20091216145627 DOT GM8059 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B29934A DOT 80902 AT towo DOT net> <4B2C0715 DOT 8090108 AT towo DOT net> <20091221101216 DOT GA5632 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20100125190806 DOT GA9166 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B5F0585 DOT 9070903 AT towo DOT net> <20100126161036 DOT GA31281 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B718CB8 DOT 7070308 AT towo DOT net> <4B72083C DOT 2090205 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B83A73C DOT 1000208 AT towo DOT net> <4B847943 DOT 9030907 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B854C3C DOT 1020204 AT towo DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4B854C3C.1020204@towo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Thomas Wolff wrote: > However, I already sent a bug report to > linux-kernel AT vger DOT kernel DOT org some months ago and there doesn't seem to > be anyone behind that mail address who would even care to respond... Well, lkml is a mailing list. Like any other high-volume list, you've got to keep at it -- repost the patch, ping it a few times, etc. http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/18/54 > so I had just hoped to get this upstream this way. Anyway, my updated > patch (attached) is now without the linux detail. Thanks. >> BTW, does this "fix" 'pstree -G'? >> > Unfortunately not. I checked pstree and it is obviously quite buggy > about terminal handling. Yep. It assumes that "well, duh, everybody supports vt100!" and then tries to access vt100 mode incorrectly. Nice. > I also checked the source and it does the wrong > thing. I looked at it some time ago, thinking to patch it "correctly" so that it would use terminfo, check capabilities, etc. Too ugly for words. > There are different methods to embed VT100 graphics codes, for short let > me call them G1 and G0. What pstree sends is: > G0-on G1-off code G0-off > Obviously terminals handle this differently. xterm and mintty seem to > still apply VT100 graphics within G0-on...G0-off despite the stray G1-off, > while my cygwin console patch doesn't, it just switches it off when it's > told "off" by one method and I thought that would be OK. > So there is two options: > - I could amend my patch with a workaround Maybe; I'm not sure what TRTTD is. Up to you. > - I/We could get pstree fixed, probably upstream? I think this is more reasonable; it's probably a very simple patch since you wouldn't be trying to do a full-monty rework all of pstree's term handling. You'd just be changing one or two sequences. Corinna is listed as the psmisc package maintainer; I'm sure PTC. >> I'll adapt and release an update relatively soon. ... >> I'm guessing that these terminfo changes need to wait until 1.7.2, right? >> > Yes, please. Ack. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple