X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100224104851.GB29779@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <6d19fbfd1002232032q38cbbd95h2d85cac48badacad AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100224104851 DOT GB29779 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:47:30 +0530 Message-ID: <6d19fbfd1002240317u7774ac4fxc8598cd20a1cc47f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Max no of parallel SSH sessions with Cygwin SSHD From: Girish Sadhani To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi Corinna, the following error was logged in the sshd.log : 2 [main] sshd 7140 d:\Sygwin\usr\sbin\sshd.exe: *** fatal error - could not load user32, Win32 error 1114 I tried to google this but could not make too much sense of the error. Its supposed to be a failure of a dll initialization. And this occurs only after the sessions limit mentioned earlier are reached. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 24 10:02, Girish Sadhani wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I am trying to use Cygwin SSHD in my project. I have defined a >> subsystem under SSHD which gets accessed by the client. >> >> Each subsystem invocation spawns 3 processes (1 sshd + 1sh + 1 tclsh). >> >> I have observed that on WinXP only 22 parallel sessions are possible >> whereas on a Win2k3 server 48 parallel sessions are possible. Both are >> of a similar hardware configuration (3Ghz CPU, 2GB RAM). After which >> it seems like some resource allocation limit is reached, though there >> is a lot more Memory and CPU available. I have tried increasing the >> heap allocation but it does not help the situation. >> >> 1. My question is that why is there a difference between the 2 OSs ? >> 2. Does XP have resource allocation lower limits than win2k3 server ? >> 3. How can this be overcome ? (some OS settings ..) > > I have no idea if that helps, but it could be related to the Windows > subsystem settings in the registry There are three values in an argument > called SharedSection which define default heap sizes. =A0The third one is > the value which would influence a sshd started as service. =A0See > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/184802 > > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Please, send mails re= garding Cygwin to > Cygwin Project Co-Leader =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat > > -- > Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > --=20 Regards, Girish. S. Sadhani -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple