X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3a8528891002230733x644a3bc1na91ddccacafb2e41@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3a8528891002220612q63d1ee8fxc69140f9b41685c5 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <20100222220208 DOT GA1308 AT tishler DOT net> 	 <3a8528891002221452h48008b49t2a17aa42a97ee5e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <20100223021729 DOT GA6116 AT tishler DOT net> 	 <3a8528891002221948k38c0cc7ei24a4822a86803df6 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> 	 <20100223131352 DOT GA4172 AT tishler DOT net> 	 <3a8528891002230733x644a3bc1na91ddccacafb2e41 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:06:02 -0500
Message-ID: <3a8528891002230806x4b565b13g1c8ded2c11ac7f88@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fetchmail call to procmail no longer works under Cygwin 1.7.1-1
From: Thomas Baker <thomasbaker49 AT googlemail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Thomas Baker  wrote:
> This also does not work:
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0procmail -d tbaker <msg.mbox
>
> However, on the netbook
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0procmail -d tbaker <msg.mbox
>
> works fine, delivering the message where it is supposed to go.

On the netbook the permissions for /usr/bin/procmail start with:
=09
	-rwxr-x---+

but on the desktop the permissions lack the final "+":

	-rwxr-x---

However, I do not see any obvious explanation in man chmod or the
books I have on hand.  Any chance this difference could be significant?

Tom

--=20
Tom Baker <tbaker AT tbaker DOT de>

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple