X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18d205ed1002200844j232c32f2l73a795d8b00f2f31@mail.gmail.com> References: <53b627ea1002200441w53f66457je7946efb277c8b31 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100220162441 DOT GA18929 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <53b627ea1002200838k31e7009gfec8b8e738dbba74 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <18d205ed1002200844j232c32f2l73a795d8b00f2f31 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:32:11 +0530 Message-ID: <53b627ea1002201402u61799e63v523e0f7721d1b42a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: netstat for reporting only TCP and UDP end points From: Karthik Balaguru To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Gregg Levine wro= te: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Karthik Balaguru > wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Christopher Faylor >> <..............> wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:11:46PM +0530, Karthik Balaguru wrote: >>>>I have been trying to use the command of 'netstat -a -n -f inet' to >>>>generate a report on all network end points not just the ESTABLISHED >>>>(-a option) by printing the IP addresses as dotted-decimal numbers(-n >>>>option), but only for TCP and UDP end points(-f inet option). But, >>>>strangely, the '-f inet' option does not seem to work in cygwin. >>> >>> Not so strange. >>> >>> netstat isn't a cygwin command. =A0It is a native Windows command. >>> >> >> :-) >> Interesting. >> Then, I think then there is some difference between the windows >> netstat and linux netstat. >> >> Thx, >> Karthik Balaguru >> > > Hello! > Quite so. The one included with the Linux TCP/IP packages provides > much more detail, and even finer details over what is seen, even > including what happens and of course why it does do that. And it is > constantly evolving. > So, in linux, it has evolved alot ! Great ! > By contrast the Windows one, is based on an earlier one to match their > early BSD derived TCP/IP stack and is only slowly catching up. > So, windows version is not equivalent to that of linux . Okay ! > However further discussion is decidedly off topic for this group, and > I only decided to say even that much because CGF really didn't want > to. > Okay, i will discuss regarding it with the relevant forum. Thx, Karthik Balaguru -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple