X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53b627ea1002200838k31e7009gfec8b8e738dbba74@mail.gmail.com> References: <53b627ea1002200441w53f66457je7946efb277c8b31 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100220162441 DOT GA18929 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <53b627ea1002200838k31e7009gfec8b8e738dbba74 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:44:45 -0500 Message-ID: <18d205ed1002200844j232c32f2l73a795d8b00f2f31@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: netstat for reporting only TCP and UDP end points From: Gregg Levine To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Karthik Balaguru wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Christopher Faylor > <..............> wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:11:46PM +0530, Karthik Balaguru wrote: >>>I have been trying to use the command of 'netstat -a -n -f inet' to >>>generate a report on all network end points not just the ESTABLISHED >>>(-a option) by printing the IP addresses as dotted-decimal numbers(-n >>>option), but only for TCP and UDP end points(-f inet option). But, >>>strangely, the '-f inet' option does not seem to work in cygwin. >> >> Not so strange. >> >> netstat isn't a cygwin command. =A0It is a native Windows command. >> > > :-) > Interesting. > Then, I think then there is some difference between the windows > netstat and linux netstat. > > Thx, > Karthik Balaguru > Hello! Quite so. The one included with the Linux TCP/IP packages provides much more detail, and even finer details over what is seen, even including what happens and of course why it does do that. And it is constantly evolving. By contrast the Windows one, is based on an earlier one to match their early BSD derived TCP/IP stack and is only slowly catching up. However further discussion is decidedly off topic for this group, and I only decided to say even that much because CGF really didn't want to. Should you wish to do so, I am open to off list discussions although I must warn you there is a contract involved and fees as well. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg DOT drwho8 AT gmail DOT com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple