X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4B7AEE63.6010301@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:13:39 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: AddAccessAllowedAce(, owner) failed: 1337 References: <9A331329F0534CADB99CA090E20A824A AT Elshadai> <4B757347 DOT 8050006 AT cygwin DOT com> <237C0953DAD04B77A03740269852B419 AT Elshadai> <4B75E029 DOT 9020500 AT cygwin DOT com> <86AE606BC4C2493EBE6359C3A52F4E40 AT Elshadai> <4B78CE89 DOT 6060606 AT cygwin DOT com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 02/16/2010 01:20 AM, Stephen Grant Brown wrote: > Again no output from the 1.7 cygcheck > > Is the cygwin1.dll from 1.5 still in memory and being accessed by the > cygcheck in 1.7 when I renamed it? > > Am I correct in saying that I am not getting any output from the > cygcheck from 1.7? > > How do you suggest I run cygcheck? I'm not sure. 'cygcheck' doesn't require 'cygwin1.dll' to run. It's a pure Win32 program. If it's not running, that points to something local getting in it's way. Again, I can only think of BLODA or other type of security application/service. Is there anything else you're running that fits this description? I also find it odd that 'cygcheck' from 1.5 runs while 1.7 doesn't. Perhaps the output (_attached_) from the 1.5 version will provide some insight if you can't find anything else causing the problem. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple