X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:47:24 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: R: aclocal problem
Message-ID: <20100211084724.GA31545@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20100210090140 DOT GA21205 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <313676 DOT 21275 DOT qm AT web25504 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com>  <20100211030521 DOT GA2654 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100211030521.GA2654@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb 10 22:05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:44:58PM +0000, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >--- Mer 10/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> >> > --- Mar 9/2/10, Marco Atzeri ha scritto:
> >> > > Autom4te::Channels::msg('obsolete.',
> >> 'configure.ac:262',
> >> > > 'warning: The macro `AC_GNU_SOURCE\' is
> >> obsolete.\x{a}You
> >> > > should r...') called at /usr/bin/autom4te-2.65
> >> line 1039
> >> > > aclocal-1.11: autom4te failed with exit status:
> >> 1
> >> No, but it might help to isolate the cause if you verify
> >> with which
> >> snapshot the problem actually started.
> >
> >2010-02-05 is the first to show such problem.
> >2010-02-04 works as expected
> 
> That would point to a newlib change since the only cygwin change
> is very trivial.

Trouble is that there is no newlib change at all in this timeframe.

Even if it's hard to believe that your compiler warning fix for regex is
the cause, it seems that it uncovered a problem lurking in this new
regex implementation all the time.

Here's another report: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-02/msg00274.html
Marco, can you please participate in that thread so we can discuss
this problem in a single spot?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple