X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:47:12 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: what's the problem of my cygwin installation? Message-ID: <20100205204712.GA13943@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <1265395465 DOT 16478 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 07:39:25PM +0000, G.W. Haywood wrote: >On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 some of us wrote: > >> [snip] this is discussed regularly... > >and: > >> And, how, exactly, would changing the name of setup.exe to something >> else cause a DECREASE in traffic? > >It seems the answer to that question is apparent. You're apparently purposely avoiding the point. Changing the name of setup.exe would generate more traffic than the handful of times this has come up here. >But I do get the message that the name of setup.exe isn't going to be >changed. You could have gotten that message by reading the very thread that you referenced. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple