X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4B68501A.80006@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:17:30 +0000
From: Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: dlclose not calling destructors of static variables.
References: <20100129184514 DOT GA9550 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <4B66BF2F DOT 4060802 AT gmail DOT com>  <20100201162603 DOT GB25374 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <4B6710CE DOT 40300 AT gmail DOT com>  <20100201174611 DOT GA26080 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <20100201175123 DOT GB26080 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <4B672B74 DOT 4090808 AT gmail DOT com>  <4B673D5F DOT 4050104 AT gmail DOT com>  <4B6746A5 DOT 3090203 AT gmail DOT com>  <4B67F236 DOT 6020307 AT gmail DOT com> <20100202151612 DOT GA8308 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To: <20100202151612.GA8308@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 02/02/2010 15:16, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> I've gotten rid of remove_dll_atexit and implemented Dave's other idea of
> specifically calling cxa_atexit when atexit is called from a DLL.  I realize
> this morning that this might require some additional tweaking to preserve
> the same order of calling but that's easily done.

  I'm just wondering whether to try and make the __dso_handle match the
ImageBase or not.  Right now it's just a symbol in the dll's .data section.

    cheers,
      DaveK




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple