X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4B5D7921.6060004@go4more.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:57:37 +0100
From: Albrecht Schlosser <cygwin AT go4more DOT de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]
References: <657633 DOT 34813 DOT qm AT web25501 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <4B5B16A5 DOT 4080104 AT go4more DOT de> <4B5BAEC3 DOT 1050507 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4B5C60A0 DOT 4050106 AT go4more DOT de> <4B5C9702 DOT 3060908 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4B5CDF1E DOT 2010107 AT go4more DOT de> <4B5CF76F DOT 5070308 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <4B5CF76F.5070308@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 24/01/2010 18:00, Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
>> I'am aware that -mno-cygwin is no longer supported, but there's
>> nothing we can do until a working gcc-4 cross compiler exists.
>> So long we need to use gcc-3 for Windows/GDI builds (or Cygwin).
> 
> That's what I'm trying to tell you: -mno-cygwin mean(t) just that: NO 
> cygwin. 

I knew that. Thanks nevertheless.

> It shouldn't be the default on Cygwin to not build for Cygwin; 
> after all, you wouldn't have the default on Linux to cross-compile to 
> Win32, would you?  If you want to provide the cross-compiling option, 
> that's fine, but it should be an *option*, not the default.

Point taken.  But unfortunately the FLTK community decided it the
other way with a majority of 74% (this must have been in or before
2003):

http://www.fltk.org/poll.php?r1

Thus this is not likely to be changed.  Sorry.

<personal opinion>
 From a Cygwin point of view you're right, of course, and I wouldn't
have any problems with this change. However, some (many?) developers
(including me) use Cygwin as a development platform to create native 
Windows programs w/o the need to use the cygwin1.dll.  The occasional
user (developer) who tries to configure a project (FLTK) would
probably be surprised if he created .exe files that can't be run
on another PC (w/o a Cygwin installation). If s/he needs the Cygwin
POSIX environment, s/he should know what to do and use
--enable-cygwin explicitly.  YMMV.
BTW.: I appreciate all the good work for Cygwin and I don't want to
miss it anymore as a development platform. And before you say "use
MinGW": I have it installed, too, but I prefer Cygwin.
</personal opinion>

[concerning not installing *.dll.a file]
>> Yep, that's what I expected, but didn't check (yet). This may
>> well be changed...
> 
> It should be, although the workaround is easy in the meantime.

I'll take a look into it and keep you informed.

Albrecht

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple