X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B5CF76F.5070308@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:44:15 -0600 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance] References: <657633 DOT 34813 DOT qm AT web25501 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <4B5B16A5 DOT 4080104 AT go4more DOT de> <4B5BAEC3 DOT 1050507 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4B5C60A0 DOT 4050106 AT go4more DOT de> <4B5C9702 DOT 3060908 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4B5CDF1E DOT 2010107 AT go4more DOT de> In-Reply-To: <4B5CDF1E.2010107@go4more.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com> List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 24/01/2010 18:00, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > I'am aware that -mno-cygwin is no longer supported, but there's > nothing we can do until a working gcc-4 cross compiler exists. > So long we need to use gcc-3 for Windows/GDI builds (or Cygwin). That's what I'm trying to tell you: -mno-cygwin mean(t) just that: NO cygwin. It shouldn't be the default on Cygwin to not build for Cygwin; after all, you wouldn't have the default on Linux to cross-compile to Win32, would you? If you want to provide the cross-compiling option, that's fine, but it should be an *option*, not the default. > Yep, that's what I expected, but didn't check (yet). This may > well be changed... It should be, although the workaround is easy in the meantime. > I don't know cygport, but I can see one small glitch: Fluid is > called fluid[.exe] and not fluid2, as in FLTK 2, and the man > page is fluid[.man] and not fluid2. Indeed, I didn't go so far as to run the package phase. (The 1.3 .cygport was basically a copy of the 2.0 .cygport, as they are both snapshots and have more in common than 1.1). Fixed in SVN. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple