X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:19:10 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: units: update, FHS compliance Message-ID: <20100122091910.GI2402@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20100120153208 DOT GB23415 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <657633 DOT 34813 DOT qm AT web25501 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <20100120165253 DOT GZ2402 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B5767F4 DOT 2040909 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20100121111115 DOT GB3741 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B589FB5 DOT 3040901 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B589FB5.3040901@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Jan 21 12:40, Yaakov S wrote: > On 21/01/2010 05:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Interesting. Especially the part about cmake. Did you try to convince > >Bill that WIN32 is not a good idea for the Cygwin distro package? > > Yes, among other things: > > http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=10122 I didn't manage to read all of it but, boy, sounds like a lot of work. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple