X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:28:15 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: units: update, FHS compliance Message-ID: <20100121152815.GA1092@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20100120153208 DOT GB23415 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <657633 DOT 34813 DOT qm AT web25501 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> <20100120165253 DOT GZ2402 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B5767F4 DOT 2040909 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <20100121111115 DOT GB3741 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100121111115.GB3741@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:11:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >Interesting. Especially the part about cmake. Did you try to convince >Bill that WIN32 is not a good idea for the Cygwin distro package? Given the previous acrimonious discussion on this matter wrt GNU make, I would say that is a lost cause. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple