X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B57A8DE.3090903@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:07:42 -0600 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ATTN: perl-Tk maintainer RE: perl-Tk is broken References: <786EBDA1AC46254B813E200779E7AD36836E65 AT srv1163ex1 DOT flightsafety DOT com> <4B5777F4 DOT 3010104 AT x-ray DOT at> In-Reply-To: <4B5777F4.3010104@x-ray.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 20/01/2010 15:39, Reini Urban wrote: > Do you need Win32 native Tk or just x Tk? > My patch was just to support Win32 Tk. I have no time for this in the > next month. Nor should you need to. I maintain the perl-Tk package, and we use the X11 interface because this is Cygwin, not ActivePerl. > x Tk aka the perl-tk package just has to be recompiled against latest > perl, cygwin and gcc. I'll admit that I haven't used perl-Tk in a while, but I just tested /usr/bin/widget with perl-5.10.1-2 and see nothing wrong. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple