X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: orpie setup.hint problem Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:26:48 -0500 Lines: 23 Message-ID: <790fl5dl58ef238ds5vhq0pkntalsf4k16@4ax.com> References: <4B576D1F DOT 9090906 AT acm DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > The requires: line for orpie mentions lapack. I think this should be > liblapack0? Hm, you seem to be right. I just uninstalled lapack and liblapack, leaving just liblapack-devel and liblapack0. I quit and restarted orpie, and it runs fine. (If you try to start orpie without any *lapack* packages installed, it just gives a black screen.) It seems to use just cygblas-0.dll, from liblapack0. > For some reason, setup never believes that lapack is installed. It keeps > listing it for installation in the Preview pane. I install it each time, > but it is never listed as an installed package by cygcheck. orpie is the > only package that depends on lapack. Yes, lapack, gcc, and I think one other package do that. It's been discussed here before but I forget the reason. It seems to be uncorrectable at present. I agree that it would be nicer to avoid that, so I'll post a new setup.hint that fixes the dependency. Thanks for reporting this. Andrew. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple