X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B565F4A.5010909@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:41:30 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin on FLOSS Weekly References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 01/19/2010 07:46 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > On 01/07/2010 06:53 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >> On 01/07/2010 07:32 PM, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>> I listen to podcasts a lot and one that I listen to is FLOSS Weekly. >>> It's about Open Source and hosted by Randall Schwartz. They do >>> episodes about various open source projects from Ardour to ZFS. I >>> think that it would be great for Cygwin to be featured on FLOSS >>> Weekly and I've emailed Randall and tried to get him to add Cygwin >>> but would really help is if Christopher or Corinna (or both) would >>> contact Randall (merlyn at stonehenge.com) and express an interest. >>> >>> How about it? Should Cygwin get on FLOSS Weekly? >> Sorry for the double post. I didn't think the first one took... > The silence is deafening?!?! Will nobody comment on this? Since you were asking specifically for Corinna or Chris to comment, I think you can understand why others haven't, and really shouldn't, respond. As far as their reasoning for not responding, it's their prerogative to keep their own council if they prefer. Perhaps they don't share your interest or simply just haven't found the time to follow-up. Regardless, you may want to consider following up off-list on this if you feel you want to pursue this further. There's not much reason to include the list on this when you want to specifically hammer it out with a couple of individuals, at least not until there's something that makes sense to include the list on. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple