X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B4FBA1E.2070009@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:43:10 -0600 From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin updates References: <3ab31ceedb33b3519257e07931dbdaf5 AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <4B4F7C90 DOT 4030509 AT x-ray DOT at> <4B4F82B1 DOT 3080605 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <4B4F908D DOT 2060709 AT x-ray DOT at> In-Reply-To: <4B4F908D.2060709@x-ray.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 14/01/2010 15:45, Reini Urban wrote: > On the cygwin mailinglist we came to some required clang patches. > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-01/msg00587.html > Sorry, untested, as I got unrelated linker errors. If I thought the patches were ready to be pushed upstream, I would have done so. I haven't even made llvm/clang patches available in Ports yet; this was a WIP discussion, and I thought I made that clear. Yaakov Cygwin/X -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple