X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <27117123.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:26:55 -0800 (PST) From: aputerguy To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ntEmacs has trouble with cygwin terminal... In-Reply-To: <416096c61001111154i38694543pedf1eb1a8d6b9b58@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <27114208 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <416096c61001111154i38694543pedf1eb1a8d6b9b58 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Andy Koppe writes: > 2010/1/11 aputerguy >> Note though that there are good reasons why I use ntEmacs and not >> cygwin Emacs > > Such as? Well 2 main reasons. First, I use emacs all the time and keep it open my whole session long. Now sometimes when upgrading cygwin, I have found myself locked out of cygwin applications (such as when base is upgraded) or I have had issues with the cygwin dll itself crashing at times and giving errors. I also don't want to have close out of all my emacs sessions when upgrading or playing around with cygwin. I find it therefore helpful to have my emacs stable and running independent of what I am doing with cygwin. Second, I like having the full GUI version of emacs but I almost never have X11 running since it just seems to add overhead to my machine, requires extra configuration, and is a bit clunky (my laptop is on the slow side). Third, and maybe less importantly, I use emacs as soon as I start setting up a new machine to take notes on my setup and it takes a while before I get cygwin running. I LOVE cygwin as much as anybody else, just it seems to me that if there is a good enough standalone app then why run it under cygwin... -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ntEmacs-has-trouble-with-cygwin-terminal...-tp27114208p27117123.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple