X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <7abf96461001092206s1b30b0b7pe784cc3d17359c13 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20100110063927 DOT GA21898 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:02:09 +1100 Message-ID: <7abf96461001092302g597e8d0fnd50c0ad6ff2706f0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Installing 1.5? From: Chip Panarchy To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hmm... well I don't seem to have any older version of Cygwin's setup, though perhaps someone on this mailing-list will? On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Christopher Faylor > wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:37:00PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: >>>Sadly, that seems to grab an up to date setup. >>> >>>http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/ pointed me to >>>http://cygwin.com/setup-legacy.exe, >> >> Or you could just read the Cygwin web page where this is referenced. > > I tried. =A0I followed the link from the text > For users who are still running one of these legacy versions of > Windows, see below (http://cygwin.com/#win-9x ) > but that didn't seem to go anywhere, just showed the list of 1.7 and 1.5 > announcements. =A0I clicked on that again just now, and finally saw the > text > Users of Windows 95, Windows 98, or Windows Me can obtain a legacy > version of Cygwin which still runs on these systems here > (http://cygwin.com/win-9x.html). > > I also looked in the FAQ, no luck. > > It might help if there were a bold headline above the text I couldn't > see, and/or > the first link went straight to http://cygwin.com/win-9x.html, and/or > if there were an FAQ entry about it. > > Thanks for Cygwin, by the way. =A0It's wonderful. > - Dan > > -- > Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple