X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B481B64.4090502@fastmail.fm> Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 01:00:04 -0500 From: Raman Gupta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.7.1-1 noacl on samba share has incorrect directory write bit References: <4B454550 DOT 9020806 AT fastmail DOT fm> <4B454E96 DOT 7060009 AT cygwin DOT com> <4B45739C DOT 4060807 AT fastmail DOT fm> <20100107180214 DOT GP23972 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B462AFD DOT 8030809 AT fastmail DOT fm> <20100107195022 DOT GQ23972 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B463D68 DOT 1070906 AT fastmail DOT fm> <20100107200946 DOT GR23972 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B46431E DOT 7050101 AT fastmail DOT fm> <20100108103215 DOT GB27916 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B47626B DOT 4060104 AT fastmail DOT fm> <4B4793BC DOT 10401 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4B4793BC.10401@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 01/08/2010 03:21 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > On 01/08/2010 11:50 AM, Raman Gupta wrote: >> With the dro option, the latter would correctly remove the write bit on >> foo in /tmp/from_noacl. > > So perhaps you can explain why setting "acl" isn't the solution here? Unfortunately, acl mode is unusable in a non-domain environment as all the files have ownership/permissions relative to the server user/group rather than the client workstation user/group. Reference this mailing list discussion back in 2000: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-12/msg00546.html It appears this discussion is actually what led Corinna to add the smbntsec mount option. The issues are summarized well in this mail from Charles Wilson: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2000-12/msg00756.html Cheers, Raman -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple