X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] updated: orpie-1.5.1-2 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 10:40:37 -0500 Lines: 14 Message-ID: <9dkek5923qni7o8cpg3jdeu1ma3c47498h@4ax.com> References: <4B471746 DOT 2040602 AT towo DOT net> <416096c61001080447w1794cc4cr519c41945173d28d AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4B474A8E DOT 6050807 AT towo DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > > * In order for lapack to work, you have to have /usr/lib/lapack in your > > $PATH. IMO that's a bug, but the lapack maintainer told me a couple of > > years ago that it's a wontfix. > > > This is done by /etc/profile.d/lapack0.*sh which also got installed, so > as Andy pointed out, it works if only you start a new login shell. Right. I'll upload a revised setup.hint with the dependency on lapack added back in. Thanks for reporting this. Andrew. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple