X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-497711.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-MDAV-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:53:05 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:53:05 +0000 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 213.123.247.160 X-Return-Path: prvs=1623dfa582=killing AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk X-Envelope-From: killing AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Cygwin List" References: <19C1823A54BB4C058061C783D86F41F8 AT multiplay DOT co DOT uk> Subject: Re: cygwin, perl or DBI seriously broken in 1.7.1? Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:52:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Been trying a few things and going back from perl 5.10.1-2 to perl 5.10.1-1 fixes the issue, or at least I can now no longer reproduce the problem readily. Looking at the differences seem to be the change in flags from "-Dmad=y" -> "-Doptimize=-O3" so we could be looking at a compiler bug? One thing for sure though 5.10.1-2 is not reliable here. Regards Steve -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple