X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Eric Blake Subject: Re: Bug printing string where the 128th char is multibyte Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eduardo D'Avila gmail.com> writes: > I've found a bug that happens when the 128th (index 127 on a 0-based > string) char of a string is a multibyte char. When I print such > string, only the multibyte char and the chars after it are displayed. What you've found is a bug in your own program, at lesat for the BUG.c version of your report. http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-01/msg00100.html Try 'printf ("%s",str)' rather than 'printf (str)' to see the difference. And why 128 bytes into the string? That's the cutoff of where gcc optimizes a printf without % into a puts. -- Eric Blake -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple