X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B3A36D0.3030102@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:05:20 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernd Bartmann CC: dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com, Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: Fwd: No go after update to 1.7.1 References: <6c18a4f0912251015k48ff2266l8fca37fc2543772e AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20091226233558 DOT GB21254 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6c18a4f0912270223w675ea650k15fadf8eb4c7de15 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20091227151902 DOT GB27191 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6c18a4f0912270949o5460c1ceq33f9e93d476614a2 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <416096c60912270956l3a82fb8fu3a62d6532dc1988a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <6c18a4f0912271000i3c5f5ecewccf1bb77e30d88b4 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4B37E68C DOT 9000304 AT cygwin DOT com> <20091227233155 DOT GA12367 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <6c18a4f0912280230k601eca9me32c056e09117866 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <6c18a4f0912290754h34c5a28s31091eeb6af1cc5a AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <6c18a4f0912290754h34c5a28s31091eeb6af1cc5a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com [ Cc'ing the list back in now, FTR. ] Bernd Bartmann wrote: >> Looks like your post didn't make it through to the list; there's nothing in >> the archive for your message with ID >> <6c18a4f0912280230k601eca9me32c056e09117866 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>. Probably >> something somewhere down the line thought a .csv attachment was suspicious, >> malicious, spammy-looking or overly-large, so I'm writing off-list to ask for >> a copy. Can't promise it'll show anything, but I'll take a look. > > Thanks Dave for pointing this out. Below you'll find my original > post. Hopefully the attachments will arrive as well. We have a suspect: > "11:09:08,3362588","bash.exe","3396","CreateFileMapping","C:\Programme\BitDefender\BitDefender 2010\Active Virus Control\midas32-v2_58\PLUGIN_NT.M32","SUCCESS","SyncType: SyncTypeOther" That's listed on BLODA. You may be able to work around by following the rebase advice discussed in these threads: "BitDefender again" http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-08/threads.html#00771 http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-09/threads.html#00009 "Confusion re: use of rebaseall vs. rebase to relieve BitDefender woes" http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-12/threads.html#00159 (I left a question unanswered in one of those threads about what the effects of relocating the cygwin1 dll to a low base address could be; the brief answer would be "largely theoretical, unless you're the type who does massive number crunching with huge arrays in fortran, or similar".) cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple