X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B38E503.9020209@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:04:03 -0500 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: run2.exe segfaults when GDI and X11 elements are present References: <4B262E7E DOT 4090001 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B280C6C DOT 90902 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B35E98A DOT 3090500 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B3621EE DOT 4090108 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B363968 DOT 1090609 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B364DCA DOT 2030601 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B365F6A DOT 1090605 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B366863 DOT 9070803 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B36E851 DOT 5060205 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B372F4A DOT 2000305 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B377101 DOT 5050602 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B37C69A DOT 7070003 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B37E04D DOT 7080201 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B37E2B9 DOT 8020801 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B386A9E DOT 9030102 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B38BA90 DOT 7030704 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B38CF63 DOT 5000409 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4B38DBEE DOT 2050600 AT cornell DOT edu> In-Reply-To: <4B38DBEE.2050600@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Ken Brown wrote: > Sorry for the confusion. I've just tried the xml file above with both > r24 and r25, and I get a segfault unless DISPLAY is set in the > environment. I hadn't noticed previously that this was still broken > because I had fixed my own test.xml file by adding the SelfOption you > suggested. Fixed in r27. Can you confirm? I believe this is the last of the known errors in your various test cases -- which isn't to say there might be others. But if you can confirm that all of the already-reported errors are fixed, then (a) let's start a new thread with any new errors, (b) or if this is working for you, then I might go ahead and release run2-0.4.0 tonight or tomorrow. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple