X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:21:04 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: My"C" Compiled can't compile "{}" Message-ID: <20091228162104.GA25890@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4B381883 DOT 7030002 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <4B382F92 DOT 4000806 AT gmail DOT com> <4B382F54 DOT 9020202 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <20091228042726 DOT GD12367 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4B38CA15 DOT 40007 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B38CA15.40007@columbus.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:09:09AM -0500, Paul McFerrin wrote: >I don't have a Linux, This code has served me very well for years. It >is perfect. Arguing this point is really not winning you any points. Your case obviously doesn't work with either gcc 3.4 or gcc 4.x. So, it has not worked for years. >I used to be a developer with Glenn Fowler and nmake developing >"compiler probe" code for nmake. If your compiler can't compile it, >then something is wrong. If you truly think this is a compiler problem then you should report it to gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org. But, be prepared to have your skin seared from your body. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple