X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:27:26 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: My"C" Compiled can't compile "{}" Message-ID: <20091228042726.GD12367@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4B381883 DOT 7030002 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <4B382F92 DOT 4000806 AT gmail DOT com> <4B382F54 DOT 9020202 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B382F54.9020202@columbus.rr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 11:08:52PM -0500, Paul McFerrin wrote: >My C compiler is at: >$ ls -l /bin/cc.exe > >lrwxrwxrwx 1 paul None 20 2009-12-23 16:09 /bin/cc.exe -> >/etc/alternatives/cc > > From my years of experiences, "{}" is the simplest version of a >to-be-compiled C program. It is syntaxily correct. in any case, the >above DID work in 1.7-68. It is not a syntactically correct C program. Try it on linux if you are not convinced. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple