X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B383735.9010106@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:42:29 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: My"C" Compiled can't compile "{}" References: <4B381883 DOT 7030002 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <4B382F92 DOT 4000806 AT gmail DOT com> <4B382F54 DOT 9020202 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4B382F54.9020202@columbus.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Paul McFerrin wrote: > From my years of experiences, "{}" is the simplest version of a > to-be-compiled C program. No it isn't. > It is syntaxily correct. No it isn't. > in any case, the above DID work in 1.7-68. No it didn't. Your code is gibberish and has never worked on anything anywhere. You're probably having a terrible mis-remembering accident based on having once seen something like "main(){}" somewhere. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple