X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B2A166F.1070008@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:30:55 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: java headers in gcc4-g++ References: <416096c60912162339o5e79111dxd359ab7b4b7da4e9 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4B29EE79 DOT 5060806 AT gmail DOT com> <4B29FA28 DOT 70602 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4B29FA28.70602@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 17/12/2009 02:40, Dave Korn wrote: >> Andy Koppe wrote: >>> The gcc4-g++ contains about 4000 Java-related headers under >>> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/include/c++. Is that as intended? >> >> Yep. > > Why? Debian packages them in libgcj9-dev[1], so they should be safe to > go in gcc4-java instead. Does it really matter? You can't use them just with gcj, you can use them just with g++, and they only take 5meg of space. So, I didn't think it mattered either way. I could shift them if there's a good reason why it makes a difference. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple