X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B28F022.8060806@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:35:14 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: libtool: link: warning References: <792220 DOT 9483 DOT qm AT web25508 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com> In-Reply-To: <792220.9483.qm@web25508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Marco Atzeri wrote: > Hi, > we are moving octave to automake/libtool > and currently on cygwin I have plenty of bogus warning > > libtool: link: warning: `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../libhdf5.la' seems to be moved > libtool: link: warning: `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../libfontconfig.la' seems to be moved > libtool: link: warning: `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/.../../../libexpat.la' seems to be moved > [cut] > > On the built libtool library file "liboctinterp.la" > I found both the right and the wrong "extended" dependency > > ----------------------------------------- > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Any idea/suggestion on how to convince libtool to look for just > /usr/lib/libhdf5.la > instead of > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../libhdf5.la > > as this seems the origin of the bogus warning ? Until one of the experts shows up, I'll post my (probably half-garbled and incomplete mis-)understanding: it depends which of the libtool variables you add -l and -L options to whether they get carried over into the dependencies or not, but if I try to remember the exact rules I'll probably get it wrong. How do your liboctinterp_la_LDADD, liboctinterp_la_LDFLAGS and/or liboctinterp_la_LIBS definitions look? It's probably a matter of tweaking what goes in which one. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple