X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B26AB33.8000209@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:16:35 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Merits of ClearCase References: <26769438 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B2557EC DOT 5070506 AT gmail DOT com> <26770209 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B257717 DOT 4070503 AT gmail DOT com> <4B2638FD DOT 3040200 AT byu DOT net> <26778349 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B2649D0 DOT 7010705 AT byu DOT net> <26779905 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Eric Blake wrote: > Finally, I feel justified continuing to argue the merits of programs offered as > part of the cygwin distribution on the cygwin mailing list, but I don't think > it is appropriate to argue the merits of proprietary non-cygwin programs on the > cygwin list. It's not really appropriate to argue their dis-merits either; you guys should really have TITTTLed it a couple of exchanges of email ago. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple